Jul 08, 2017 · Agnikulas claim origins from firepit and Agni deva, most of these clans have origins in Southern Rajasthan Abu region where hunas,sakas,greeks, kushans and many other tribes ruled for centuries. they also share their clan names with Jats, Gujjars and other martial Castes such as Chauhan and solanki. are Agnikulas are assimilated Rajputs/kshatriyas ?
May 07, 2021 · They believe that all the so-called agnikula Rajputs are of Gurjara stock. The Gurjara origin of the Rajputs is being criticised by Pratipal Bhatia. She argues that the Gurjara is not only the name of a people but also a country and of all the people who inhabited it, to whichever caste or clan they might have belonged (Bhatia 1970: 14).
📌 : Several socio-political organizations were formed in the 19th and 20th Centuries in India. Anjuman-e-Khawatin-e-Islam, founded in the year 1914 was -Estimated Reading Time: 1 min
Sep 06, 2013 · Agnikula Thoery. This theory comes from the Prithvirajraso of Chandarbardai. The Rajputs descended from Agni. The theory is based upon the Agnikula Legend of Bhavishyapurana which says like this: “There will be Bindusara “Like the father, there will be Asoka and his sons who will rule “At that time there will be a Brahmin in Kanyakubja Clan
Sep 16, 2021 · Agnikula Theory This theory is from the book ‘Prthiviraj Raso’ written by Chandbardai in which he written that the Rajputs originated from a sacrificial fire …
Aug 09, 2021 · Agnikulas claim origins from firepit and Agni deva, most of these clans have origins in Southern Rajasthan Abu region where hunas,sakas,greeks, kushans and many other tribes ruled for centuries. they also share their clan names with Jats, Gujjars and other martial Castes such as Chauhan and solanki. are Agnikulas are assimilated Rajputs/kshatriyas ?
Jan 19, 2020 · Agnikula Thoery: This theory comes from the Prithvirajraso of Chandarbardai. The Rajputs descended from Agni. So, this theory says that the forefathers of the Rajputs were born at Mount Abu. The four Rajput clans from Agnikunda are Chauhans, Chalukyas, Parmaras and Pratiharas.
Aug 14, 2021 · And in case of Parmara, Bhandarkar is at great pains to point out one evidence which makes them foreigners but declares Parmaras as Agnikula for their relationship with the Chaulukyas and the others. Bhandarkar was relied upon by Smith in his articulations on foreign origins of the Rajputs in his paper on coins of Chapa or Chapotakas in 1907.
A third group, Agnikula (“Family of the Fire God”), is the group from which the Rajputs derive their claim to be Kshatriyas. Rajput habits of eating meat (except beef) and other traits suggest both foreign and aboriginal origins.
In Indian culture, the Agnivanshi are people who claim descent from Agni , the Vedic god of fire. The Agnivanshi lineage Agnivansha or Agnikula is one of the three lineages into which the Rajput clans , Parihars divided, the others being the Suryavanshi descended from Surya , the sun god and the Chandravanshi descended from Chandra , the moon god. Apart from Rajputs, several other Indian communities and dynasties have legends of fire-born ancestry. Alf Hiltebeitel theorises that the fire-lineage legends signify a new class of Kshatriya warriors, as opposed to the earlier warriors who claimed descent from the solar and lunar lineages mentioned in the ancient texts. Among the clans now known as the Rajputs, the legend might have been invented by Padmagupta, a 10th-century court poet of the Paramara dynasty. His Nava-sahasanka-charita is the earliest source claiming an Agnivanshi origin for the Paramaras. He might have been motivated by the fact that the Paramaras were the only royal family in their region without a mythical account of heroic or divine origin. The 16th century Rajput bards might have extended the legend to include other imperial dynasties, in order to foster Rajput unity against Muslims. Among the dynasties that are now called Rajputs, the Paramara kings of Malwa were the first to claim an Agnikula "fire clan" ancestry. Several inscriptions and literary works composed during the Paramara era mention this legend. The Sanskrit-language epic was composed during the reign of Sindhuraja ca. Its version of the legend is as follows: . The son of Gadhi Vishvamitra stole the wish-granting cow of Vashistha, just like Kartavirya Arjuna had once stole the cow of Jamadagni. The barkcloth on the bosom of Arundhati Vashistha's wife became soaked with tears. The earliest of the knowers of Atharva Veda Vashistha then made a fire offering with mantras. A hero with a bow, a crown and golden armour emerged from the fire. He brought back Vashistha's cow. The grateful owner of the cow named this hero "Paramara" "slayer of the enemy" , and gave him the power to rule the entire earth. From this hero, who resembled Manu , sprang the Paramara dynasty. Padmagupta's Nava-sahasanka-charita is based on the life of Sindhuraja, but is of little historical value. Therefore, it appears that Padmagupta invented the legend in late 10th century. The Paramaras were the only ones without a legend of mythical origin. This might have motivated Padmagupta to invent a new legend with Sindhuraja's approval. The post-Sindhuraja Paramara inscriptions and literary works widely mention the Agnikula myth. The Paramara inscriptions which mention this legend include the Udapur Prashasti inscription, the Nagpur stone inscription, the Vasantagarh inscription, the Arthuna inscription of Chamundaraja, the Neminath Jain temple inscription, the Donagaragrama inscription, the Patnarayan inscription and the Jainad inscription. The earliest of the Chauhan inscriptions and literary works do not claim Agnivanshi descent. Some recensions of Prithviraj Raso , an epic poem by Chand Bardai , contain a legend similar to the Paramara legend. However, this version does not present the sages Vashistha and Vishwamitra as rivals. It goes like this:  . Demons interrupted the ceremony by polluting it with flesh, blood, bones and urine. To get rid of these demons, Vashistha performed a homa ritual. This led to the appearance of a hero named Pratihara "door-keeper" , who Vashistha placed on the road leading to the palace. After this, another hero named Chalukka appeared from the hollowed palm of Brahma. Finally, a third hero appeared, who sage named Pavara or Para-mara, "slayer of the enemy". However, these three heroes were not able to stop the demons. Vashistha then dug up a new fire pit, and made yet another offering to the fire, to conjure a new hero. This four-armed hero held a sword, a shield, a bow, and an arrow. Vashistha named him Chahavana, performed his coronation with Vedic hymns, and then ordered him to fight the demons. The sage also asked the goddess Ashapura to help the hero. Chahuhvana killed the demon Yantraketu, while the goddess killed the demon Dhumraketu. On seeing this, the other demons fled. Pleased with Chahuvana's bravery, the goddess agreed to be his family deity. Prithviraj Chauhan , the hero of Prithiviraj Raso , was born in this family. Prithviraj Raso is the earliest source that includes four different Rajput dynasties not just the Paramaras in this legend. Scholars such as Dasharatha Sharma and C. Vaidya , who analyzed the earliest available copies of Prithviraj Raso , concluded that its original recension did not contain this legend at all. Singh believes that the 16th century poets came up with the legend to foster Rajput unity against the Mughal emperor Akbar. Adaptions of the Prithviraj Raso legend occur in later works written under the patronage of the various Chauhan dynasties. It was composed by Jodharaja, a court poet of prince Chandrabhana of Neemrana. Its version of the legend is as follows: . Parashurama slaughtered Kshatriyas warriors 21 times. The only escapees were those who disguised themselves as women, those who fled leaving behind their swords and those who fell at his feet. The absence of any warriors led to a dark age, where rakshasas demons increased in number, Vedas came to be trampled under feet, and Hinduism was forgotten. The sages then visited Parashurama's cave on Mount Abu. Vashistha erected a fire altar and worshipped Shiva , who appeared before the sages.
However these certain Rajput clans that since atleast 10th century are claiming themselves having the Agni-lineage and legend that they are telling Vishvamitra snatching Vashistha's cow is mentioned in Ramayana and Mahabharata as an origin of Sakas and other foreigners. After this, another hero named Chalukka appeared from the hollowed palm of Brahma. It is generally asked as if Rajputs originated from Sakas then why don't Rajputs have Iranian names. In the 19th century, the region that constitutes most of the present-day Rajasthan was called Rajputana by the British. It was composed by Jodharaja, a court poet of prince Chandrabhana of Neemrana. Apart from Rajputs, several other Indian communities and dynasties have legends of fire-born ancestry. Kalhan here definitely meant the country not a race or tribe. Historical Dictionary of the Tamils. Parmars claiming that they have defeated some Huna chief has no connection with my points. However, this version does not present the sages Vashistha and Vishwamitra as rivals. Note the extension of a tribe which came to north west India and spread upto Karnataka in south to Kashmir in north. Medieval history after the fall of Harsha to the dominance of Islamic invaders has been characterised by the rise of Rajputs in the region now called Rajputana comprising territories of Rajasthan, North Gujarat and Malwa. In this version, the stolen cow called "Nandini" retaliates by creating the various mleccha tribes from different parts of her body. The Right to impose reasonable restrictions on the fundamental Right of Indian Citizens lies with -. Among the dynasties that are now called Rajputs, the Paramara kings of Malwa were the first to claim an Agnikula "fire clan" ancestry. Tod was handicapped by lack of historical research and epigraphical evidence which since then has been amply collected, collated and interpreted by trained historians and scholars. Which one among the following is common to the Treaty of Yandaboo , the Treaty of Salbai and the Treaty of Gandamak ? Until 20th century Rajput ruled in trounce majority in the princely states of Rajasthan and Surashtra. Tod found in Prithviraj Raso a convenient source to formulate his theory of foreign origin. Gujjars are indigenous to India, have nothing to do with Hunas. Home About Contact. At the age of 80's he led the troops against the British during first freedom struggle of Ultimately, god provided them with the Rajputs for their security purpose. Jul USA. Mar Canada. Title: Which of the following are the four Agnikula class of Rajputs Author: mympsc. TomarRajput said:. They erected a new altar and conducted a fresh ceremony, singing hymns from the Sama Veda. Leaders of this resistance and opposition to Islam called themselves Rajputs. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. The Paramara dynasty descended from Ponwar. Aupmanyav Ad Honorem. Institute of Historical Studies. Alf Hiltebeitel states that the colonial historians saw the foreign-origin theory as a way of justifying their own colonial invasion. The 'Bombay Plan' drafted by G. The sages then visited Parashurama's cave on Mount Abu. This is a Most important question of gk exam. So, this theory says that the forefathers of the Rajputs were born at Mount Abu. Tod was the originator, he can be excused for the lack of evidence available to him but Vincent Smith and DR Bhandarkar carried on the same set of conclusions drawn so erroneously by Tod despite an abundance of epigraphical evidence in the subsequent times. Rajasthan was a cradle land of such fortresses. It appears that the concept of the solar and lunar Kshatriyas of the Sanskrit literary texts was replaced in the bardic account of Raso and inscriptions during the early medieval period by that of agnikula origin. In the capacity of local rulers they might have naturally governed a large portion of land under them and, thus, played an active role in political and administrative system of the state. Feb 1, Asia. Who is the greatest Rajput king? According to this theory, the foreign ancestors of these Rajputs came to India after the decline of the Gupta Empire around 5th century CE. In fact by 3rd Century BC Megasthenese speaks of people in India marrying into their own Varna and by the time Raso was written assimilation of foreigners into Hindu fold was a taboo. Download as PDF Printable version. The inscriptions of the western and central India also refer to the territorial expansion of the Rajput power by suppressing the tribal settlements of the Bhils, Pulindas and Sabaras. Shakambhari — the capital of the main line of the Chahamaans — also came out of the colonization, which was earlier a forest land jangaladesha. Scholars such as Dasharatha Sharma and C. Who is more powerful Rajput or JAT? According to K. The term Scythian refers to the Huns and other associated tribes who entered in India during fifth and sixth centuries. What was called Rajputana by the British?